Another Logo Battle

The 40-year evolution of a logo.

In case you’ve been hiding under a rock for the last week, Starbucks is changing their logo. Gone is the outer ring reading “Starbucks Coffee” leaving just an updated version of the mermaid or siren in its place.

There’s plenty of debate about the logo change; even Harvard Business Review has weighed in on it.

I’m no designer — not by a long shot — but taken into the context of the company’s three previous logos, the new version looks like a logical extension of that development.

But what fascinates me most, from a branding perspective, is that Starbucks has become so universally ubiquitous that the name is no longer needed. Green mermaid in a circle? Sure, that’s clearly and undeniably Starbucks, just as much as the golden arches are the unmistakable symbol of McDonald’s, or the swoosh undoubtedly belongs to Nike.

By removing the “coffee” from the logo, it also allows Starbucks to expand the brand. Expand to what, exactly? I’m not sure, but then again, 10 years ago I didn’t imagine that I’d be sitting in a coffee shop writing this post, so only time will tell.

One Response to Another Logo Battle
  1. Greg O.
    January 14, 2011 | 10:29 pm

    I woulda kept “Starbucks” and jettisoned “Coffee” at this stage. Not both.

Leave a Reply

Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

Trackback URL http://clarifyingcomplexideas.com/2011/01/logo-battle/trackback/
Contact Alisa

hello at clarifyingcomplexideas dot com
Get the latest blog updates via RSS.
Subscribe via Email